ipswich.gov.uk

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24663

Received: 16/10/2017

Respondent: Alice Martin

Representation Summary:

Again apparent lack of land in Ipswich? Agree P/O/N/M should not be developed as it is the other side of the A14/A12 and would be an odd fit with the town. I can think of no sane reason why E/F/G and H through to L shouldn't be developed especially given the shortage of land in Ipswich. C looks appropriate if the current gypsy site is kept as it is.

Full text:

Again apparent lack of land in Ipswich? Agree P/O/N/M should not be developed as it is the other side of the A14/A12 and would be an odd fit with the town. I can think of no sane reason why E/F/G and H through to L shouldn't be developed especially given the shortage of land in Ipswich. C looks appropriate if the current gypsy site is kept as it is.