ipswich.gov.uk
CS9
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7102
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Eileen Mayers
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7109
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Terry Gravett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7116
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Veronica Wallis
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7123
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr J Goodchild
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7130
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs P Goodchild
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7137
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Christine R Buckle
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7144
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Joan P Boston
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7151
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Brock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7158
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr John Hicks
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7165
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Helen Johnson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7172
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Jay Johnson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7179
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Diana Sharpin
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7186
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr G McNeil
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 7193
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Brian Bigmore
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.