5.5
Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 636
Received: 07/03/2014
Respondent: Lafarge Tarmac
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Representation Summary:
The amendment to delete reference to the Haven Gateway sub-region is understood, however, the important role of Ipswich Port should still clearly be emphasised.
Full text:
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 778
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Representation Summary:
We disagree that Ipswich residents possess a wide range of skills as elsewhere the CS acknowledges low skills and educational achievement in the workforce as identified in the Suffolk Growth Strategy.
Full text:
see attached