7.2
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 124
Received: 06/03/2014
Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd
Agent: Mersea Homes Limited
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The document only sets out its strategy for future development in part. Through reliance on windfall sites and deferring decisions about growth later in the Plan period, it only shows locations for just over 50% of the 10,500 homes needed to 2031. Although the Plan period is extended and the housing requirement increased, the strategy has not changed from the adopted Core Strategy. The Review fails to identify specific deliverable sites or broad locations for the full housing requirement, and fails the tests of Soundness.
Sites/broad locations should be identified within the Borough first to meet the full housing requirement.
Please see attached.
Comment
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 206
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Historic England
It is not clear why the key diagram depicts a relatively constrained area within the town centre as "Conservation of the Historic Core", given that the historic core of Ipswich goes beyond this area and includes places such as the Waterfront. It implies that the historic environment beyond this constrained area may not be conserved.
It is not clear why the key diagram depicts a relatively constrained area within the town centre as "Conservation of the Historic Core", given that the historic core of Ipswich goes beyond this area and includes places such as the Waterfront. It implies that the historic environment beyond this constrained area may not be conserved.
Support
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 721
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects
The key diagram is an important part of the Core Strategy. Crest supports the identification of key regeneration opportunities within the Borough and supports the principle of planning for a strong, healthy core. Crest fully supports the presentation of the Northern Fringe as the location of development to 2031 and welcomes the deletion of the suggestion that only limited development could take place there before 2021. This important amendment is a more positive policy and introduces suitable flexibility to allow the key supply of deliverable housing land to contribute materially to the housing target early in the plan period.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 792
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
bullet iii Allocates the entire Ipswich Northern Fringe for development and our comments regarding page 22 also apply here. Urban regeneration and improving more deprived areas will be facilitated by limiting development on the Northern Fringe during the early years of the CS. Whilst we welcome the Governments recent announcement to offer incentives for the development of brownfield sites, we believe some form of restriction should be retained to help achieve regeneration/deprivation and sustainability objectives (i.e. Section 8.6).
see attached