Object

Representation ID: 592

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mersea Homes Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Bringing forward the Northern Fringe is critical to Ipswich's growth. It is important that the plan reads consistently. Currently paragraph 8.111 adds nothing to the plan and it should therefore be deleted.

Object

Representation ID: 626

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Babergh District Council & Midsuffolk District Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Amend para 8.111 and include it within the Policy text itself.
"The Council will work with Babergh, Mid Suffolk and Suffolk Coastal District Councils to ensure optimum sustainable distribution of any development within the Ipswich Policy Area, bearing in mind the amenity and ecological value of the countryside outside the Borough boundary as well as within it, and the increased congestion effects of any development outside the Borough boundary. Any such development must be supported by adequate infrastructure. Provision outside the Borough boundary will only be sought where evidence shows that locations within the boundary are unsuitable for such provision."

Object

Representation ID: 856

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Para 8.111 We note and support this intention but would point out that if this had happened earlier more sustainable solutions may have been agreed in preference to developing the Ipswich Northern Fringe, closer to employment growth sites and on lower grade agricultural land.