Proposed Site Allocations and Policies Map
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 467
Received: 27/03/2014
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Site Allocations Map and IP-One Area Inset show the Area of Archaeological Importance but should also show the Scheduled Monuments.
See attached.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 681
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Policies map and policy DM46 Port of Ipswich - The County Council, as Minerals and Waste Planning authority, is content with the document, though the proposals maps should show the port areas protected for mineral handling facilities
See attached.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 748
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Number of people: 323
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Against the existing Local Plan, this proposes further loss of countryside off Tuddenham Rd in addition to the three Garden Suburb neighbourhoods and the erosion of such designated countryside in the Borough is not acceptable or sustainable. No assessment of the traffic issues has been made which include increased traffic; its effects on the humpback bridge, the absence of footways on the adjacent narrow stretch of road;increased coach usage and rat running on Humberdoucy Lane. These should be examined in detail and resolved before redesignation is considered.
see attached