ipswich.gov.uk

CS20

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 625

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Babergh District Council & Midsuffolk District Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

BDC/MSDC notes that paragraph 8.240 supports the aspiration for a northern bypass and that the merits and options are fully investigated. However while the justifications regards the Orwell Bridge are accepted BDC/MSDC are concerned about the traffic impacts of the Northern Fringe on congestion given the development is being brought forward early. We are also concerned to understand the impacts on rural roads/villages that lie to the north of the development (such as Claydon/Coddenham), would this require any element of the northern by pass and if so that Policy CS20 should be revised accordingly.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 644

Received: 07/03/2014

Respondent: Lafarge Tarmac

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Council must ensure that regeneration proposals do not prejudice existing HGV movements into and from the Ipswich Port. Transport proposals must take appropriate account of existing haulage routes and where possible help facilitate improvements which will also benefit the movement of traffic between this key employment area and the A14.

Full text:

See attached.

Support

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 867

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Representation Summary:

Para 8.240 We note and support that 'The Council will work with neighbouring authorities and Suffolk County Council to ensure that the merits and delivery options for some form of northern bypass are fully investigated.'

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 891

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The identification of shuttle bus services would depend on viability. In the case of the Waterfront, the short-term actions would, instead, be to enhance the pedestrian and cyclist experience along the waterfront and provide access to key locations for pick up/ drop off and servicing.

Full text:

See attached.