ipswich.gov.uk

8.28

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5161

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: clive gissing

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land

Full text:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5405

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Support the strategy of urban renaissance in Ipswich and note the first bullet point 'it will maximise opportunities to re-use previously developed land within central Ipswich.' The proposed removal of the 60% target for development on brownfield land is a negative step. With the multi-site development of the Garden Suburb concerned that developers will focus on greenfield development. This will have a detrimental impact on the regeneration of brownfield sites particularly in the town centre and deprived areas.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5589

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Cyril Eden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5661

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jane Catling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5704

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

SOCS endorse the Northern Fringe Protection Group's points. Support the strategy of urban renaissance in Ipswich and note the first bullet point 'it will maximise opportunities to re-use previously developed land within central Ipswich.' The proposed removal of the 60% target for development on brownfield land is a negative step. With the multi-site development of the Garden Suburb concerned that developers will focus on greenfield development. This will have a detrimental impact on the regeneration of brownfield sites particularly in the town centre and deprived areas.

Full text:

See attached.