8.28
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5161
Received: 04/03/2015
Respondent: clive gissing
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land
For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5405
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Number of people: 323
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support the strategy of urban renaissance in Ipswich and note the first bullet point 'it will maximise opportunities to re-use previously developed land within central Ipswich.' The proposed removal of the 60% target for development on brownfield land is a negative step. With the multi-site development of the Garden Suburb concerned that developers will focus on greenfield development. This will have a detrimental impact on the regeneration of brownfield sites particularly in the town centre and deprived areas.
See attachment
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5589
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Cyril Eden
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attachment
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5661
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jane Catling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attachment
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5704
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
SOCS endorse the Northern Fringe Protection Group's points. Support the strategy of urban renaissance in Ipswich and note the first bullet point 'it will maximise opportunities to re-use previously developed land within central Ipswich.' The proposed removal of the 60% target for development on brownfield land is a negative step. With the multi-site development of the Garden Suburb concerned that developers will focus on greenfield development. This will have a detrimental impact on the regeneration of brownfield sites particularly in the town centre and deprived areas.
See attached.