8.76

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5139

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: The Ipswich Society

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Support but require changes. It is good to see that the majority of the housing new builds will take place on Previously Developed Land , apart from the Ipswich Garden Suburb. It is disturbing that 4051 of the 10,585 needed by 2031 have no identified site. It would be helpful to add in the figures from Ipswich Travel To Work Area to shed light on the contribution from the other authorities in the IPA to our housing problem.

Full text:

It is good to see that the majority of the housing new builds will take place on Previously Developed Land , apart from the Ipswich Garden Suburb.
It is disturbing that 4051 of the 10,585 needed by 2031 have no identified site. It would be helpful to add in the figures from Ipswich Travel To Work Area to shed light on the contribution from the other authorities in the IPA to our housing problem.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5337

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The objection is that there is recognition that the Council has not met the requirement under the NPPF to identify wither specific sites in years 1-10 or broad locations for years 11-15. There is recognition from the Council that the Plan does not meet the objectively assessed housing need. There is recognition the the Council and neighbouring authorities need to work together to achieve a robust strategy, there is recognition that this work has not been done yet.

Full text:

See attached