ipswich.gov.uk
8.108
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5171
Received: 04/03/2015
Respondent: Parliament
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
No new roads other than those actually in the new development are indicated in the SPD.
No new roads other than those actually in the new development are indicated in the SPD.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5227
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Martin Hore
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
With regard to road infrastructure this is totally unsound. Only additional traffic in the immediate vicinity of the Garden Suburb has been considered.
Strong representations in the earlier consultation re the effect on traffic congestion in other parts of Ipswich have been ignored.
Specifically access from the Garden Suburb to the A14/A12 and the town's main employment and out-of-town shopping areas will require traffic to transit the Norwich Road, Valley Road, Chevallier Street, and Yarmouth Road junctions which are already over-congested and a designated AQMA.
With regard to road infrastructure this is totally unsound. Only additional traffic in the immediate vicinity of the Garden Suburb has been considered.
Strong representations in the earlier consultation re the effect on traffic congestion in other parts of Ipswich have been ignored.
Specifically access from the Garden Suburb to the A14/A12 and the town's main employment and out-of-town shopping areas will require traffic to transit the Norwich Road, Valley Road, Chevallier Street, and Yarmouth Road junctions which are already over-congested and a designated AQMA.