ipswich.gov.uk

8.109

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5125

Received: 22/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Sharpin

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The very reason the planning application was refused is lack of infrastructure. This does not appear to have changed.

Full text:

|The very reason the planning application was refused is lack of infrastructure.This does not appear to have changed.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5172

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Subsequent traffic modelling by the applicants and by SCC invalidate the previous assumptions upon which the Secretary of State made his previous judgement.

Full text:

Subsequent traffic modelling by the applicants and by SCC invalidate the previous assumptions upon which the Secretary of State made his previous judgement.