4.4
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17431
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Suzanne Restall
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17439
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Maureen Morritt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17447
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr William Morritt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17455
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr T Watkins
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17463
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs G Watkins
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17471
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Frew
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17479
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Lorna Frew
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17487
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sally Bovey
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17495
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Spooner
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17503
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Ruth Spooner
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17511
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr A Whitehead
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17519
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr B Earthy
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17527
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Y Earthy
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17535
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr M J Ardern
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17543
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs E J Ardern
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17551
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr B Tenwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17559
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs A Tenwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17567
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr William Crees
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17575
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Lois Joy Thurstun
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17583
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr R L Osborne
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17591
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs S M Matuszczyk
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17599
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Marion Prior
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17607
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Doug Betts
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17615
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Jill Suffolk
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17623
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr B Ironman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17631
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr K Newlands
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17639
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Charles E Vass
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17647
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Ann Chadwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17655
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Paul and Pam Pettit
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 17663
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr K P Griffith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.