4.4
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18159
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Barbara Stephen
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18167
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Jeff Cook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18175
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs D Cook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18183
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs J M Jordan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18191
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Barbara Clarke
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18199
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Edward and Jacqueline Gooch
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18215
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Clive Bischoff
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18223
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Christine O'Dowd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18231
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Dexter O'Dowd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18239
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Roger Phillips
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18247
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Melanie Phillips
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18255
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Robert Hardie
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18263
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Tony Debenham
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18271
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Pam Debenham
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18279
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr S Wilson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18287
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Ann Wilson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18295
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Mary Smith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18303
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Stephen Fowler
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18311
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Aaron Fowler
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18319
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Patricia Kelly
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18327
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr David Gazeley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18335
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Dianne Gazeley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18343
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Chris and Wendy Brown
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18351
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Chris and Wendy Brown
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18359
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Simon Down
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18367
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr P Skinner
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18375
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Steven J Chapman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18383
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Mary D Chapman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18391
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr David C Adams
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 18399
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sharon Adams
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? No
IBC has not demonstrated that it has effectively worked with neighbouring Authorities on cross boundary issues affecting jobs, housing and infrastructure since there are no published results nor results incorporated into the CS. This does not accord with the 2011 Localism Bill and consequently the CS should not be adopted. IBC needs to demonstrate that the strategic purchase of the old sugar beet factory was with the prior agreement of Babergh Council.
IBC needs to explain in the CS how this strategic purchase aligns with employment and housing growth strategies and targets [to focus new employment within the town centre].
See attached.