Object

Representation ID: 5157

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This vision contradicts the preceding statement in 6.3. The vision is anodyne and non-specific.

Object

Representation ID: 5202

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

As stated in our response to the 2013 consultation, the vision makes little reference to the historic environment. Given that the NPPF requires local plans to set out a positive strategy for the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment (paragraph 126), the vision should contain explicit reference to how the Local Plan will address Ipswich's historic environment and heritage assets. Without such reference, we consider the Core Strategy is unsound as it is not consistent with national policy.

Object

Representation ID: 5403

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Support the vision but consider the strategy will not deliver it. The development of the Garden Suburb will result in severe congestion in north Ipswich and the town centre. Proposals to increase opportunities for buses, walking and cycling to the town centre are flawed as evidence challenges the viability of job creation in the town centre. Homes growth without jobs and sustainable transport will result in more commuting. This will harm prospects for investment. Updated traffic modelling and air quality modelling must be undertaken.

Object

Representation ID: 5449

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Ipswich Central

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The Vision should take account of the Greater Ipswich Partnership Vision for change to the central area.

Object

Representation ID: 5699

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

SSOCS endorse the NFPG's points. Support the vision but consider the strategy will not deliver it. The development of the Garden Suburb will result in severe congestion in north Ipswich and the town centre. Proposals to increase opportunities for buses, walking and cycling to the town centre are flawed as evidence challenges the viability of job creation in the town centre. Homes growth without jobs and sustainable transport will result in more commuting. This will harm prospects for investment. Updated traffic modelling and air quality modelling must be undertaken.