ipswich.gov.uk
DM3 - Provision of Private Outdoor Amentity
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5434
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Number of people: 323
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to the change from 'rear garden area' to 'private garden area' as this will result in much smaller dwelling plots, some with no rear gardens at all and more cramming together of properties including infill. Welcome the stipulation in 9.21 that 'garden sizes need to be calculated independently of any parking space(s) to be provided.'
See attachment
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5551
Received: 02/03/2015
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd (HBF)
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
This policy is unsound because it is unjustified.
Policy DM3: Provision of private outdoor amenity space in new and existing developments
This policy is unsound because it is unjustified.
We have been unable to locate a justification for this policy in respect of new development. The Council needs to provide evidence that the provision of outdoor amenity space has been unsatisfactory.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 5717
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
SOCS endorse the Northern Fringe Protection Group's points. Object to the change from 'rear garden area' to 'private garden area' as this will result in much smaller dwelling plots, some with no rear gardens at all and more cramming together of properties including infill. Welcome the stipulation in 9.21 that 'garden sizes need to be calculated independently of any parking space(s) to be provided.'
See attached.