ipswich.gov.uk

IP048 - Mint Quarter / Cox Lane

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5240

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

This is a very sensitive site, where approximately half of the site is designated as a scheduled monument and there is considerable archaeological potential across the whole site. The site also adjoins the conservation area and listed buildings.

Although the revised site sheet now refers to the above heritage assets the wording is not effective with regards to archaeological considerations, particularly with regards to the scheduled monument. The revised site sheet should also be strengthened with regards to its wording on the conservation areas and listed church, and better linked to national policy wording.

Full text:

This is a very sensitive site, where approximately half of the site is designated as a scheduled monument (part of the Saxon town) and there is considerable archaeological potential across the whole site. The site also adjoins the Central Conservation Area to the south and listed buildings to the south and east, with a locally listed façade along Carr Street. The above heritage assets greatly influence the redevelopment of the site. We note that the Sustainability Appraisal identifies potential negative effects from this site on the historic environment (Objective ET9).

Although the revised site sheet now refers to the above heritage assets (and helpfully refers to the need to retain the locally listed façade on Carr Street), the wording is not effective with regards to archaeological considerations, particularly with regards to the scheduled monument. The extent of archaeological potential within this site and the wider area is not fully understood and there could be nationally important archaeology within the site where development may be constrained. The revised site sheet should also be strengthened with regards to its wording on the conservation areas and listed church, and better linked to national policy wording.

As currently drafted, we consider the plan to be unsound in terms of its effectiveness, deliverability and consistency with national policy. Paragraph 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework requires Local Plans to provide detail with site allocations where appropriate (fifth bullet point), with the Planning Practice Guidance stating "where sites are proposed for allocation, sufficient detail should be given to provide clarity to developers, local communities and other interests about the nature and scale of development (addressing the 'what, where, when and how' questions)" (PPG Reference ID: 12-010-20140306 (last revised 06/03/2014). Conservation of the historic environment is a core planning principle (Paragraph 17) and Local Plans should set out a positive strategy in this respect (Paragraph 126).

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5374

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Matt Clarke

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The East of England Co-operative Society support redevelopment of the Mint Quarter. It is considered that an element of flexibility should be applied to the mix of uses that would be considered acceptable in this area, in order to maximise the potential for achievement of regeneration of this important site. Such flexibility should also extend to the façade of parts of the former Co-operative department store frontage to Carr Street, following inclusion in the Local List SPD.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5454

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Ipswich Central

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Site IP048 - the area of this site that sits closest to Upper Brook Street should be allocated for a modern 'big-box' retail cluster. We envisage something like an out-of-town retail development with parking, built on this in-town site.

Full text:

Site IP048 - the area of this site that sits closest to Upper Brook Street should be allocated for a modern 'big-box' retail cluster. We envisage something like an out-of-town retail development with parking, built on this in-town site.