IP256 - Artificial hockey pitch, Ipswich Sports Club
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5135
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Ames
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
I object to the inclusion of site ref IP256 for the following reasons:
- site has drainage problems
- access to Henley Road is inadequate
- density is completely out of keeping with the surrounding area
I object to the inclusion of site ref IP256 for the following reasons:
- site has drainage problems
- access to Henley Road is inadequate
- density is completely out of keeping with the surrounding area
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5136
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Alexander McDonald
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
I object to this proposal the site area of the hockey pitch is not 0.87 but in fact 0.80 as the former figure includes the access road to the club. the hockey pitch has been well used since 1952 and with the development of 3500 homes on the Northern fringe the retention of this sporting facility is important for health of residents and feel confident will thrive and prosper. Once this land is lost there will be nowhere for the club to grow. if allocated the maximum density should be 12 units in keeping with surrounding area.
I object to this proposal the site area of the hockey pitch is not 0.87 but in fact 0.80 as the former figure includes the access road to the club. the hockey pitch has been well used since 1952 and with the development of 3500 homes on the Northern fringe the retention of this sporting facility is important for health of residents and feel confident will thrive and prosper. Once this land is lost there will be nowhere for the club to grow. if allocated the maximum density should be 12 units in keeping with surrounding area.
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5321
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Stewart Quantrill
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Pleased to note that the number of dwellings has been reduced to 18. However, the density is out of character with the area and a lower density should be recommended. The development would diminish the effective use and potential for sport in the local area. It is important to encourage local facilities, especially when considering the effect of traffic related to the planned Northern Fringe development.
See attachment
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5518
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Sport England
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
No objection provided the supporting text clearly indicates the need for quantitative or qualitative replacement provision, depending on the findings of the Playing Pitch Strategy currently being carried out by Ipswich Borough Council.
See attachments
Support
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5533
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Sports Club
Agent: Mr Leslie Short
Support the allocation of land for residential development and confirm that the site is available and deliverable now.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5601
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: House of Commons
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Understand that Ipswich Sports Club has applied to Ipswich Borough Council for the land that the artificial grass hockey pitch sits on to be included in the local plan for building, in order to increase its leisure facilities and create a 'hockey-hub'. I also understand that Ipswich Borough Council are conducting a strategic review of sports facilities which is due to be completed in March/April 2015. Wish to support Ipswich Sports Club and ask the Council to consider the development of their sports facilities in the strategic review.
See attachment
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5825
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Summers
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Access is limited and not suitable for the volume of traffic development would create, the hockey pitch has been well used and we should not reduce community facilities.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 5826
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Summers
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The access is limited and not suitable for the volume of traffic the development would create, the hockey pitch is a well used community facility.
See attached