ipswich.gov.uk

IP256 - Artificial hockey pitch, Ipswich Sports Club

Showing comments and forms 1 to 8 of 8

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5135

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Ames

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

I object to the inclusion of site ref IP256 for the following reasons:
- site has drainage problems
- access to Henley Road is inadequate
- density is completely out of keeping with the surrounding area

Full text:

I object to the inclusion of site ref IP256 for the following reasons:
- site has drainage problems
- access to Henley Road is inadequate
- density is completely out of keeping with the surrounding area

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5136

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Alexander McDonald

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

I object to this proposal the site area of the hockey pitch is not 0.87 but in fact 0.80 as the former figure includes the access road to the club. the hockey pitch has been well used since 1952 and with the development of 3500 homes on the Northern fringe the retention of this sporting facility is important for health of residents and feel confident will thrive and prosper. Once this land is lost there will be nowhere for the club to grow. if allocated the maximum density should be 12 units in keeping with surrounding area.

Full text:

I object to this proposal the site area of the hockey pitch is not 0.87 but in fact 0.80 as the former figure includes the access road to the club. the hockey pitch has been well used since 1952 and with the development of 3500 homes on the Northern fringe the retention of this sporting facility is important for health of residents and feel confident will thrive and prosper. Once this land is lost there will be nowhere for the club to grow. if allocated the maximum density should be 12 units in keeping with surrounding area.

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5321

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Stewart Quantrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Pleased to note that the number of dwellings has been reduced to 18. However, the density is out of character with the area and a lower density should be recommended. The development would diminish the effective use and potential for sport in the local area. It is important to encourage local facilities, especially when considering the effect of traffic related to the planned Northern Fringe development.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5518

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Sport England

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

No objection provided the supporting text clearly indicates the need for quantitative or qualitative replacement provision, depending on the findings of the Playing Pitch Strategy currently being carried out by Ipswich Borough Council.

Full text:

See attachments

Support

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5533

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Ipswich Sports Club

Agent: Mr Leslie Short

Representation Summary:

Support the allocation of land for residential development and confirm that the site is available and deliverable now.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5601

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: House of Commons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Understand that Ipswich Sports Club has applied to Ipswich Borough Council for the land that the artificial grass hockey pitch sits on to be included in the local plan for building, in order to increase its leisure facilities and create a 'hockey-hub'. I also understand that Ipswich Borough Council are conducting a strategic review of sports facilities which is due to be completed in March/April 2015. Wish to support Ipswich Sports Club and ask the Council to consider the development of their sports facilities in the strategic review.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5825

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Access is limited and not suitable for the volume of traffic development would create, the hockey pitch has been well used and we should not reduce community facilities.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Representation ID: 5826

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The access is limited and not suitable for the volume of traffic the development would create, the hockey pitch is a well used community facility.

Full text:

See attached