ipswich.gov.uk

CS2: The Location and Nature of Development

Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 796

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17403

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mark Pond

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17411

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Francis M Jacobi

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17419

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Lynette M Jacobi

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17427

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Clive Restall

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17435

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Suzanne Restall

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17443

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Morritt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17451

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr William Morritt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17459

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr T Watkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17467

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs G Watkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17475

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Frew

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17483

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Lorna Frew

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17491

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sally Bovey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17499

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Spooner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17507

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Ruth Spooner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17515

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr A Whitehead

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17523

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr B Earthy

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17531

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Y Earthy

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17539

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr M J Ardern

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17547

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs E J Ardern

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17555

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr B Tenwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17563

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs A Tenwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17571

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr William Crees

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17579

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Ms Lois Joy Thurstun

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17587

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R L Osborne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17595

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs S M Matuszczyk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17603

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Marion Prior

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17611

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Doug Betts

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17619

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Jill Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17627

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr B Ironman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 17635

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr K Newlands

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

For improved effectiveness and soundness it is recommended a target be reinstated for the use of brownfield land with priority given to regenerating these sites in preference to developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Full text:

See attached.