CS7: The Amount of Housing Required
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16630
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sheila D Sword
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16640
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs M Smith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16650
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs C Page
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16660
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Bloomfield
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16670
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: V Hill
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16680
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Andrew Peters
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16690
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: K H Rich
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16700
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: B Dickerson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16710
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr T Smith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16720
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Chris Neophyton
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16730
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Kevin Peck
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16740
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Stephanie Peck
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16750
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Tim Spencer
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16760
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Alice Spencer
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16770
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Anna Spencer
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16780
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Smye
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16790
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Helen McCartney
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16800
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: D J Green
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16810
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs J E Green
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16820
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr G M Haynes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16830
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs P Cook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16840
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: J Mayhew
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16850
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs R Mayhew
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16860
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard John Keeble
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16870
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Tim Leggatt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16880
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Girling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16890
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Girling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16900
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs P Girling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16910
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr M Girling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 16920
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr G Root
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to the requirement for 13,500 homes - they are not needed and this number is not desirable. It requires a big increase on current building levels and those since 2008.
See attached.