ipswich.gov.uk

CS10: Ipswich Garden Suburb

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 1091

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5688

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Chris Wall

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to Garden Suburbs on grounds of design, traffic congestion, air quality and drainage

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5698

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Julian Mason

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The garden suburb proposals do not sufficiently consider the additional infrastructure requirements that a large development of this type would demand. Traffic is the obvious issue — the suburb would necessitate a Northern bypass to accommodate the huge rise in vehicular traffic. Other considerations would be health, schools, pollution and waste-water.

Full text:

See attached

Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5742

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mick Wright

Representation Summary:

I welcome the fact that there will be a small country park built into the design of the Northern Fringe development.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5746

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: D C Norman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5756

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Pinner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5767

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Tuddenham St Martin Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to inward-looking focus regarding traffic infrastructure for Ipswich Garden Village, ignoring anything outside the Borough boundary. The Parish Council have severe reservations about the predicted peak hour traffic generation, which is based on surveyed traffic for similar housing areas. Suffolk Constabulary measured traffic through Tuddenham St Martin: 30,000 vehicles travelled through the village in one week, last November. This brings in to disrepute the traffic modelling work using old census data. This concern has been raised before with Ipswich Borough Council and Suffolk County Council but no reply has been received. Concerned about the plan's impacts on the village.

Full text:

See attached.

Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5772

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Pachent

Representation Summary:

The plan will deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5774

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Pachent

Representation Summary:

CS10 is sustainable development and the public are being listened to in regard of the garden suburb proposal.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5779

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs David and Pamela McCartney

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5804

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Yvonne Maynard

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Country Park Plans are unacceptable

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5808

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Philip Maynard

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Country Park Plan is unacceptable

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5817

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Creasey

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Question the effectiveness of the plan which allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See atttached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5833

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5844

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5855

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5866

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Charlotte Miller

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5879

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Roy Bush

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5887

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr James Collins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5893

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: T Holden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm the integrity of a European designated habitat. CS10 and table 8B need to be revised.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5899

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: F A Leeder

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm the integrity of a European designated habitat. CS10 and table 8B need to be revised.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5906

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: A W Parkin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5926

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs A Snook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5934

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: D Roberts

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5947

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Robert and Rosemary Free

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5956

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Robert and Rosemary Free

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5968

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Jill Page

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5969

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Frank Seal

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15014

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Keats

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15024

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Cantwell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15034

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anne Saggers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Full text:

See attached.