ipswich.gov.uk

CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 1015

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5881

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Roy Bush

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5907

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: A W Parkin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5917

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R Snook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5927

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs A Snook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 5971

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Frank Seal

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15012

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Keats

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15025

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Cantwell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15035

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anne Saggers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15044

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Stammers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15053

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs H E Hawker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15063

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard N Cater

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15085

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs D Jarman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15095

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: D Thorn

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15109

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Roberta Seal

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15121

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Dennis Hussey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15145

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Sarah Marsden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15158

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Young

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15170

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Carole Young

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15182

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Glynne Whitehead

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15194

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Justin Keys

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15206

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Keys

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15218

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D E Reed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15230

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Galpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15242

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D Halstead

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15254

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jane Halstead

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15266

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Bright Hammond

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15278

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs L R Child

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15290

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr T A Child

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15302

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian M Town

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 15314

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Lily Town

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.