CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23877
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr N Haines
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23890
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs H M L Haines
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23946
Received: 24/02/2015
Respondent: Mr D Walker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23953
Received: 24/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anne Walker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23960
Received: 02/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Peggy Royce
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23972
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Frances Crane
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23973
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Crane
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23990
Received: 02/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Paul Thomas Miles
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23991
Received: 02/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Shirley Ann Miles
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23997
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Frederick Farrow
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24010
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr R Mills
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24017
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs L Mills
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24026
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Stewart Quantrill
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24035
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Plumbly
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24044
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Davina E Farrow
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24053
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Linda Quantrill
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24058
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Howarth
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24070
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is not known where the 12,500 jobs will come from or whether the retail and shopping policies are achievable and would make Ipswich a better place.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24153
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Derek Hayward
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24160
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Janet Hayward
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24168
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Adrian Smith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24176
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr B Garraway
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24184
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr David Brett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24196
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Nigel Wall
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Not enough jobs in central Ipswich to warrant all the new housing
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 24205
Received: 20/07/2015
Respondent: Susan Wallace-Shaddad
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The jobs will not come in Ipswich.
See Attached.