ipswich.gov.uk

CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth

Showing comments and forms 991 to 1015 of 1015

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23877

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr N Haines

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23890

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs H M L Haines

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23946

Received: 24/02/2015

Respondent: Mr D Walker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23953

Received: 24/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anne Walker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23960

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Peggy Royce

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23972

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Frances Crane

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23973

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian Crane

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23990

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Paul Thomas Miles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23991

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Shirley Ann Miles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 23997

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Frederick Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24010

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr R Mills

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24017

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs L Mills

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24026

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Stewart Quantrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24035

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Plumbly

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24044

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Davina E Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24053

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Linda Quantrill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24058

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Howarth

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24070

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is not known where the 12,500 jobs will come from or whether the retail and shopping policies are achievable and would make Ipswich a better place.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24153

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Derek Hayward

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24160

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Janet Hayward

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24168

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Adrian Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24176

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr B Garraway

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24184

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr David Brett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24196

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Nigel Wall

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Not enough jobs in central Ipswich to warrant all the new housing

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Representation ID: 24205

Received: 20/07/2015

Respondent: Susan Wallace-Shaddad

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The jobs will not come in Ipswich.

Full text:

See Attached.