Object

Representation ID: 15538

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Colin Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15550

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Ms Glenys Bassett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15562

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Reed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15574

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Andrew Reed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15586

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Monger

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15598

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Jeffrey N Dunn

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15610

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Godfrey R Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15622

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mary C Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15634

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Ball

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15646

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Malcolm John Woolnough

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15658

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Shepherd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15670

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ernest G Thomas

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15682

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Judith Stephenson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15694

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Alfred Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15706

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Janet Graham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15718

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Dr Jean Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15730

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Kent

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15742

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard F Yapp

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15754

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Matthews

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15766

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Matthews

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15778

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Terence Hagan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15790

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Hagan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Traffic congestion has always been a key concern for residents. The CS fails to properly assess development and infrastructure requirements including the cumulative effects on traffic, air pollution, fresh water and wastewater. Updated traffic and air quality modelling should be undertaken and development not be permitted unless effective mitigation methods can be implemented. Freshwater and waste water infrastructure needs to be objectively assessed and key infrastructure listed in the CS. The risks to delivery should be identified.

Object

Representation ID: 15807

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Terence and Linda Chambers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15817

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Colin Girling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15827

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs G M Girling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15837

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Diane Penman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15847

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Penman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15857

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mary Hunt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15867

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D Smithe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15877

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Terence and Linda Chambers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.