Object

Representation ID: 15887

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Cooper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15907

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Alec Baker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15917

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Stewart

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15927

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Valerie Bryne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15937

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Dave Robinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15947

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr A Bryne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15957

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Eaton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15967

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Leonard Woolf

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15977

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: C Richards

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15987

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Susan Margerum

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 15997

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: P Slade

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16007

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: C E Judd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16017

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Kevin Cullum

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16027

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: K Richards

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16037

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian Burns

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16047

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: K L Beaumont

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16057

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Andrew Kokonas

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16067

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: James Bulstrode

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16077

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Christopher Banthorpe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16087

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: A R Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16097

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: C M Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16117

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Cathryn Silver

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16127

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Lynn Mehmed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16137

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Judy Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16147

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Robin A Silver

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16157

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Jordan Silver

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16167

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Miss J Turner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16177

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs S Turner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16187

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: T M Turner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Object

Representation ID: 16197

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mario Giner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.