Object

Representation ID: 5152

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: clive gissing

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Without properly defined specific and measurable jobs growth objectives the CS is unsound. To improve clarity and effectiveness 2 jobs targets are required: one for the Borough and one for outside the Borough. Measurement indicators should be specified.

Object

Representation ID: 5156

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: clive gissing

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The housing target Objective 3(a) is so poorly defined as to be ineffective and as such the CS is unsound. To improve soundness a specific, realistic and measurable housing growth target is required for the Borough of Ipswich, based on the best available data and forecasts. IBC plans to help grow housing in neighbouring LAs. This needs to be explained and agreed with neighbouring LAs, together with a plan of how it will be achieved and progress measured.

Object

Representation ID: 5163

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This level of housing allocation cannot be supported without new infrastructure, little of which is identified in this document.

The affordable housing target for the IGS is unrealistic and is not the current target being discussed with developers, so should be omitted as misleading.

Object

Representation ID: 5288

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Kesgrave Covenant Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Objective 3 states that at least 13,550 new homes are to be provided within the Ipswich Housing Market Area, but the plan do not achieve that Objective.

Object

Representation ID: 5396

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

ONS migration data used by the Council only extends to 2010/11, the latest ONS forecast shows no net migration from 2012-2031 for Ipswich. DCLG's February 2015 household projections suggest a need for 10,434 new homes. The baseline household figure used is too high. The Viability Report indicates 28% affordable housing for the Garden Suburb, the affordable housing target should not compromise delivery of other infrastructure. It is not clear whether the jobs target relates to Ipswich or the Ipswich Policy Area. How will jobs growth be measured? A higher population has been used to estimate jobs growth than population growth.

Object

Representation ID: 5542

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Arwel Owen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

We consider that the objective of securing at 35% affordable housing within the Ipswich Garden Suburb is unsound since it is neither justified by the evidence presented by the Council in its evidence base, neither is it effective since this provision is demonstrably not capable of being achieved under prevailing conditions of viability. A full representation is submitted against Policy CS12.

Object

Representation ID: 5582

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Cyril Eden

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Without properly defined specific and measurable jobs growth objectives the CS is unsound. Two jobs targets are required: one for the Borough and one for outside the Borough. Measurement indicators are needed.
The housing target is so poorly defined as to be ineffective. To improve soundness a specific, realistic and measurable housing growth target is required for the Borough of Ipswich, based on the best available data and forecasts. IBC plans to help grow housing in neighbouring LAs. This needs to be explained and agreed with neighbouring LAs, together with a plan of how it will be achieved and measured.

Object

Representation ID: 5584

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Are 13,500 homes needed, are they desirable, and are they deliverable? SOCS do not support this figure as justified or necessary. SOCS believe the 12,500 jobs target is unrealistic and undeliverable. There has been no real jobs growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the NPPF. Endorse NFPG points also.

Object

Representation ID: 5602

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Mavis Hammond

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The jobs and homes figures are not justified. Without properly defined specific and measurable jobs growth objectives the CS is unsound. Two jobs targets are required: one for the Borough and one for outside it. Measurement indicators are needed.
The housing target is so poorly defined as to be ineffective. A specific, realistic and measurable housing growth target is required for Ipswich Borough, based on the best available data and forecasts. IBC plans to help grow housing in neighbouring LAs. This needs to be agreed with neighbouring LAs, together with a plan of how it will be achieved and measured.

Support

Representation ID: 5616

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Ashfield Land Limited

Objective 3 of the adopted Core Strategy requires that 18,000 additional jobs are to be provided in the Ipswich Policy Area between 2001 and 2025 (draft policy CS13 of the draft Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document) encourages the provision of in the region of 12,500 jobs between 2011 and 2031). In accordance with this objective, it is estimated that the Ipswich Business Park has the capacity to generate up to 2,000 new jobs within the B1, B2 and B8 Business use classes.

Object

Representation ID: 5658

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jane Catling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Without properly defined specific and measurable jobs growth objectives the CS is unsound. Two jobs targets are required: one for the Borough and one for outside the Borough. Measurement indicators are needed.
The housing target is so poorly defined as to be ineffective. To improve soundness a specific, realistic and measurable housing growth target is required for the Borough of Ipswich, based on the best available data and forecasts. IBC plans to help grow housing in neighbouring LAs. This needs to be explained and agreed with neighbouring LAs, together with a plan of how it will be achieved and measured.

Object

Representation ID: 5668

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Bridges

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?
There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5680

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Bridges

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?
There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5714

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mark Tweedale

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The housing target Objective 3(a) is so poorly defined as to be ineffective and as such the CS is unsound. To improve soundness a specific, realistic and measurable housing growth target is required for the Borough of Ipswich, based on the best available data and forecasts. IBC plans to help grow housing in neighbouring LAs. This needs to be explained and agreed with neighbouring LAs, together with a plan of how it will be achieved and progress measured.

Object

Representation ID: 5741

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: D C Norman

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?
There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5752

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Brian Pinner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?
There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5775

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs David and Pamela McCartney

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?
There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable. Better infrastructure should be provided locally first. For example, prior to a northern fringe development new relief roads to the north and west are required and faster rail networks to London, Cambridge and Norwich should be provided.

Object

Representation ID: 5802

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Yvonne Maynard

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Do not understand how 12500 jobs will be created

Object

Representation ID: 5811

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Philip Maynard

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Do not understand how 12500 jobs will be created.

Object

Representation ID: 5815

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Creasey

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?

Object

Representation ID: 5822

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Creasey

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?

Object

Representation ID: 5827

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5828

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?

Object

Representation ID: 5839

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5840

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?

Object

Representation ID: 5850

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5851

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Summers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?

Object

Representation ID: 5861

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Charlotte Miller

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is no need for 13,500 homes and this number is not desirable.

Object

Representation ID: 5862

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Charlotte Miller

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Where will 12,500 jobs come from?

Object

Representation ID: 5875

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Roy Bush

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The housing target is so poorly defined as to be ineffective. To improve soundness a specific, realistic and measurable housing growth target is required for the Borough of Ipswich, based on the best available data and forecasts. IBC plans to help grow housing in neighbouring LAs. This needs to be explained and agreed with neighbouring LAs, together with a plan of how it will be achieved and measured.