Object

Representation ID: 24280

Received: 21/11/2015

Respondent: Mr Alfred Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The assessment of housing need does not reflect the most recent information.

Object

Representation ID: 24283

Received: 21/11/2015

Respondent: Dr Jean Wheeler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The assessment of housing need does not reflect the most recent information.

Object

Representation ID: 24286

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs David and Eileen Warren

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No evidence of compliance with the Localism Bill on effective policies and co-operation with adjacent Authorities on jobs and housing where you ignore up-to-date evidence on housing assessment.

Fail to take into account how financial investment in the sugar beet site will have on future jobs and homes in Ipswich. How the development of brownfield sites such as the former Volvo site, owned by the Council, and the 10acre nearby site owned by another, both immediately available for residential use, without negative input on employment. Both can be developed, without the need for redesigned roads, sewerage systems or cost to the Council.

Object

Representation ID: 24289

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Paragraph 3.4 of the Statement of Consultation does not accurately capture all of the issues raised. This includes issues raised in relation to the assessment of housing not being updated to reflect the most recent information available including the DCLG Household Projections 27th February 2015 and the ONS migration data. Concerned that the genuine concerns and issues raised by the public have been disregarded. CS7 will fail if the balance between jobs growth and housing are not aligned.

Object

Representation ID: 24303

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Paragraph 3.4 of the Statement of Consultation does not accurately capture all of the issues raised. This includes issues raised in relation to the assessment of housing not being updated to reflect the most recent information available including the DCLG Household Projections 27th February 2015 and the ONS migration data. Concerned that the genuine concerns and issues raised by the public have been disregarded.

Object

Representation ID: 24321

Received: 21/12/2015

Respondent: Mr Arwel Owen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed modification provides nothing more than a factual update on recent housing delivery but is in itself unclear and without clarity. The Plan remains unsound on the basis of a lack of up-to-date evidence.