ipswich.gov.uk

2 - CS2 The Location and Nature of Development (MOD 1)

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Support

Core Strategy and Policies DPD Review - Pre-Submission of Main Modifications

Representation ID: 24230

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Crest Strategic Projects

Representation:

Emerging Policy CS2: The Location and Nature of Development - We support the amendment to the wording of Policy CS2 which removes the requirement to provide suitable infrastructure 'prior' to the delivery of the IGS. This reflects Table 8B in Chapter 10 of the Proposed Submission Core Strategy, which sets out trigger points for the delivery of items of infrastructure (this table is not proposed to be modified).

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Core Strategy and Policies DPD Review - Pre-Submission of Main Modifications

Representation ID: 24292

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation:

CS1 - CS6 may be undeliverable and therefore CS11-20 may be undeliverable. The CS2 modification to accelerate and allocate the Northern Fringe in its entirety will not improve accessibility.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Core Strategy and Policies DPD Review - Pre-Submission of Main Modifications

Representation ID: 24307

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Marine Management Organisation

Representation:

Marine plans apply up to the mean high water springs mark, which includes the tidal extent of any rivers. Marine plans guide decision makers on development in marine and coastal areas. In 2014 the East Inshore and Offshore marine plans for the area north of Felixstowe were published, becoming a material consideration for public authorities. The MMO is currently developing marine plans for the South Inshore and Offshore Plan Areas. Where a marine plan is not currently in place, we advise local authorities to refer to the Marine Policy Statement for guidance on planning that involves coastline or tidal river.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Core Strategy and Policies DPD Review - Pre-Submission of Main Modifications

Representation ID: 24310

Received: 21/12/2015

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

This change introduces a rather vague reference to 'community development' with no definition provided as to what this means in this context. This contravenes §154 of the [National Planning Policy] Framework.
Clarity is important because this section of the policy outlines where new development will be focussed. It has a strong 'geographic' thrust, so it is unclear how the reference to supporting community development fits with this.
The aim of ensuring that new development promotes wellbeing and social inclusion is already embedded within national policy.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Core Strategy and Policies DPD Review - Pre-Submission of Main Modifications

Representation ID: 24318

Received: 21/12/2015

Respondent: Mr Arwel Owen

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

The proposed additional wording is ambiguous in its intent. Policies seeking to secure social cohesion would be better presented with a justification for that policy and clear means of implementing and monitoring policy requirements.

Full text:

See attachments