ipswich.gov.uk

Core Strategy SA Report Addendum ISSUED 07.10.15 (PDF)

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Supporting Consultation Documents

Representation ID: 24257

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation:

Issues raised previously haven't been addressed. The SA represents an optimistic view. For example it assumes 15% modal shift from cars to more sustainable transport. The impact on the town centre of the Council's focus on delivering the sugar beet site should be assessed. It does not assess the potential impacts of the garden suburb development halting midway. How can the SA make meaningful conclusions in light of incomplete and missing data? It should identify negative effects on heritage in relation to Red House Park. Not surprised by conclusions that there are no changes to significant effects or mitigation.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Supporting Consultation Documents

Representation ID: 24258

Received: 23/11/2015

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Representation:

The SA quite rightly highlights the lack of information and uncertainty in assess the effects on traffic, air quality and climate change of circa 4,000 homes identified in the Core Strategy to be built in association with neighbouring local authorities and exposes a hole in the Core Strategy which needs to be rectified at this review.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Supporting Consultation Documents

Representation ID: 24300

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

Issues raised previously haven't been addressed. The SA represents an optimistic view. For example it assumes 15% modal shift from cars to more sustainable transport. The impact on the town centre of the Council's focus on delivering the sugar beet site should be assessed. It does not assess the potential impacts of the garden suburb development halting midway. Not surprised by conclusions that there are no changes to significant effects or mitigation.

Full text:

See attachment.

Support

Supporting Consultation Documents

Representation ID: 24301

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Representation:

The SA quite rightly highlights the lack of information and uncertainty in assess the effects on traffic, air quality and climate change of circa 4,000 homes identified in the Core Strategy to be built in association with neighbouring local authorities and exposes a hole in the Core Strategy which needs to be rectified at this review.

Full text:

See attachment.