ipswich.gov.uk

Question 14:

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24680

Received: 18/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Chris Wheeler

Representation Summary:

Wickham Market should be considered, and any other locations having good rail access.

Full text:

Wickham Market should be considered, and any other locations having good rail access.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 24966

Received: 25/10/2017

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Representation Summary:

The distribution options need to be reassessed to take account of the Government's White Paper targets.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25032

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd (HBF)

Representation Summary:

Consider a combination of the options. Whilst some higher density development and changes of use must be considered, there will be a need for some of Ipswich's needs to be accommodated elsewhere. IBC should be clear how many homes will be provided elsewhere and ensure that the other authorities allocate sufficient sites to meet those unmet needs. SCDC options will need to take account of the need to meet some of Ipswich's unmet needs. Some could be near to Ipswich but the Council should also consider increasing housing delivery at other towns and villages. SCDC could consider an approach that draws on aspects of each option that will support the necessary growth to meet the needs of the area. The plan must be clear how needs are being met and that there are shared policies, contingency measures and monitoring to facilitate this joint working.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25386

Received: 30/11/2017

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Representation Summary:

The opportunity exists for the delivery of a further sustainable extensions to the urban area of Ipswich at Bucklesham Heath Garden Village to support the delivery of the vision for the HMA and FEA` (Please see the Bucklesham Heath Garden Village Vision Document). By supporting significant levels of further growth in the form of a new garden village to the East of Ipswich, the Plan can take a proactive step towards delivering the new homes, infrastructure and facilities that the urban areas needs to create a positive impact on the local, regional and national economy.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25458

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Representation Summary:

The likely closure of the Rock Barracks around 2027 may have an impact on the spatial choices within Suffolk Coastal. Whilst redevelopment options are unknown, the infrastructure needed for different options for the site will vary. Owing to different traffic characteristics, for example, further traffic may be expected to use of the B1083 and A1152, which may not have sufficient capacity (see also comments on infrastructure - questions 29, 30, 32).

Full text:

See attached.