ipswich.gov.uk

Question 52:

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25076

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: On behalf of EDF Energy

Representation Summary:

We consider that 6 months marketing evidence should be sufficient in order to demonstrate the lack of demand for the land. This approach would be in accordance with paragraph 22 and 51 of the NPPF.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Representation ID: 25103

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: AquiGen

Representation Summary:

We consider that the present Policy DM25 marketing test is appropriate in establishing whether a site is suitable / viable for employment use or not. The marketing period represents an appropriate balance and reasonable time period for demonstrating whether a specific site is required or not. As such, aside from its use for development management purposes, it can inform allocations going forward.

Full text:

See attached.