Question 52:
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25076
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: On behalf of EDF Energy
We consider that 6 months marketing evidence should be sufficient in order to demonstrate the lack of demand for the land. This approach would be in accordance with paragraph 22 and 51 of the NPPF.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25103
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: AquiGen
We consider that the present Policy DM25 marketing test is appropriate in establishing whether a site is suitable / viable for employment use or not. The marketing period represents an appropriate balance and reasonable time period for demonstrating whether a specific site is required or not. As such, aside from its use for development management purposes, it can inform allocations going forward.
See attached.