Comment

Representation ID: 24948

Received: 27/10/2017

Respondent: Historic England

We welcome specific provision for the protection and enhancement of archaeology and emphasis that sites of archaeological importance can occur everywhere. Give clear guidance on expectations for archaeological recording and the submission of records with an appropriate public record for archaeological remains that are not retained in situ. Where suggested sites are located in areas of known archaeological potential, give weight to this as a consideration in site selection. Liaise with the County Archaeologist at site allocation stage. Emphasise in policies and supporting text that the setting of heritage assets should be considered holistically as part of the historic environment.

Comment

Representation ID: 25258

Received: 30/11/2017

Respondent: Ipswich Archaeological Trust

On the whole, the town's archaeological assets have been well-protected by the planning policies. However, some nationally important sites, excavated on the waterfront, have not been analysed and brought to archive or publication following the bankruptcy of the developers. The costs of excavating some of the more complex sites has rendered their development unprofitable. Serious consideration should be given to how the Local Plan Policies can be used to ensure that the necessary funds are available. One option would be to create the fund through an archaeological levy on ALL future planning consents or the use of the existing CIL.