Question 93:
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24759
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: RSPB
Agent: RSPB
The RSPB welcomes the Council's intentions for providing greenspace as part of the Ipswich Garden Suburb. However, the Council should ensure that it meets Natural England's Access to Natural Greenspace Standard.
The RSPB welcomes the Council's intentions for providing greenspace as part of the Ipswich Garden Suburb. However, the Council should ensure that it meets Natural England's Access to Natural Greenspace Standard.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24815
Received: 19/10/2017
Respondent: Ministry of Defence
The aerodromes are protected with statutory birdstrike safeguarding consultation zones. Therefore, DIO Safeguarding is concerned with the development of open water bodies, the creation of wetland habitat, refuse and landfill sites. These types of development have the potential to attract large flocking bird species hazardous to aviation safety.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24828
Received: 20/10/2017
Respondent: Ipswich Wildlife Group
In addition to the new Garden Suburb country park, more natural greenspace will be needed for the benefit of the increased population and for wildlife. Expansion of natural greenspace around the green rim is vital to increase accessibility to more residents.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24911
Received: 27/10/2017
Respondent: The Woodland Trust
We strongly support the Council's proposal to include a country park and around 20 ha of new woodland as part of the Ipswich Garden Suburb. We do not have sufficiently detailed knowledge of Ipswich to be able to recommend other areas for tree planting and woodland creation. However, we are ready to work with the Council on taking forward planting when you have identified suitable areas.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24990
Received: 25/10/2017
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
If there is no reduction in the green rim then we believe the current size of the planned country park is appropriate for the current Local Plan provided the other current open space (including sports space) requirements are implemented (including access to sports space at schools). An increase in accessible natural green space (and other outdoor space) will be required if further development to that under the current Local Plan is proposed for the revised Plan. The green rim needs to be geographically defined on a map.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25026
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Wildlife Trust
Whilst we acknowledge that a new country park will be provided as part of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, we query whether this will address the existing deficit of accessible natural greenspace in the north of the town given the number of new residents that will result from the development? Opportunities to provide additional new accessible natural greenspace should be explored in order to address the existing deficit.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25047
Received: 31/10/2017
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
If there is no reduction in the green rim then we believe the current size of the planned country park is appropriate for the current Local Plan provided the other current open space (including sports space) requirements are implemented (including access to sports space at schools). An increase in accessible natural green space (and other outdoor space) will be required if further development to that under the current Local Plan is proposed for the revised Plan. The green rim needs to be geographically defined on a map.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25321
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Personally living in the North West of Ipswich I have never considered there to be a lack of green space in the area and was surprised when I saw the statistic. With that in mind I do not think there is the need for additional green space.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25349
Received: 26/10/2017
Respondent: Greenways Countryside Project
Agent: Mr James Baker
More accessible natural greenspace is required in addition to the new Garden Suburb countrypark to meet the needs of a growing population/biodiversity. Although very positive, the new GS country park is small for the numbers of people living in the area. Expansion of natural greenspace around the green rim (from the GS country park and generally) is vital to increase the diversity of greenspace offered and accessibility to more residents. Pond Hall Farm should be included within Orwell Country Park to allow visitors to be drawn away from the protected estuary on routes that will cause less disturbance to wildlife.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25493
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Mr Arwel Owen
As the Council notes, the IGS will deliver a new country park serving new and existing development and reducing potential impacts on sensitive habitats to the south of the town. The country park will provide the necessary mitigation for development both in the northern fringe and town-wide. There is therefore, in our view, no need for further mitigation to serve that function. Where development is located away from Ipswich and its fringes - for example further along the A14 corridor, it is possible that specific mitigation may be required to serve those new homes.
See attached.