Question 95:
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24829
Received: 20/10/2017
Respondent: Ipswich Wildlife Group
Management of open spaces by local authorities in partnership with specialist organisations such as Suffolk Wildlife Trust is the strategy most likely to maintain the wildlife benefit and provide accountability.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 24913
Received: 27/10/2017
Respondent: The Woodland Trust
We recognise that the cost of maintenance of landscapes/open space is a significant issue for councils. We would ask you to consider planting of small areas of woodland on existing areas of grass, where these are less well used, or in new developments to put in woodland before the houses are built. Our report, Trees or Turf shows clearly that woodland gives many more environmental, social and economic benefits than does short mown grass (e.g. carbon sequestration, removal of pollutants from the atmosphere, shading of buildings in summer etc) and can also be managed significantly more cheaply.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25028
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Suffolk Wildlife Trust
With regard to maximising the biodiversity value of open spaces, we consider that strategic management as part of the wider network of sites is likely to be most beneficial.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Representation ID: 25356
Received: 26/10/2017
Respondent: Greenways Countryside Project
Agent: Mr James Baker
Management of open spaces by local authorities (often in partnership with each other and specialist organisations such as Suffolk Wildlife Trust) is the most likely to maintain the wildlife benefit and provides local accountability and a fair distribution of the costs. Management companies and contractors are less likely to sensitively manage wildlife habitats and are not accountable.