Comment

Representation ID: 24756

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: RSPB

Agent: RSPB

On a wider scale, extending the network across the IHMA through co-operation with neighbouring planning authorities is the first step.
Integrating SuDS in to new developments (see earlier representations on Q74/75) and retrospectively will enhance the network whilst at the same time offer wider socio-economic benefits as previously stated.
Working in effective partnership across agencies is critical to effective delivery.

Comment

Representation ID: 24831

Received: 20/10/2017

Respondent: Ipswich Wildlife Group

To improve the value of the Wildlife Network, creating links with surrounding districts would increase its value and effectiveness. Continuity could be achieved by the neighbouring districts having similar networks for the relevant areas around the fringes of Ipswich. This would ensure vital connections are maintained across political boundaries.

Comment

Representation ID: 25030

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Wildlife Trust

The network needs to explore links into and out of the 'green rim', both into town and out into the surrounding districts. A joined up cross boundary approach should be taken to delivering the network on the edge of town and in Suffolk Coastal DC, Babergh DC and Mid Suffolk DC.

Comment

Representation ID: 25352

Received: 26/10/2017

Respondent: Greenways Countryside Project

Agent: Mr James Baker

The wildlife network of the town is excellent, but needs adequate resourcing to ensure efforts to maintain, enhance and monitor it are sufficient (ie: the Greenways Project/Parks Service). In order to greatly improve the value of the network, it is clear that links into the surrounding districts are vital for it to be truly meaningful. Continuity could be achieved by the neighbouring districts having similar networks (and related planning policies) for the relevant areas around the fringes of Ipswich. This would ensure vital connections are maintained across political boundaries.

Comment

Representation ID: 25496

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: River Action Group

Agent: Mr James Baker

The Group would like to see the Plan identify and protect areas of undeveloped land alongside the river for wildlife (and public access) benefit. Proper maintenance and monitoring of the habitats and corridor is essential to ensure the wildlife network functions are delivered, and additional resources are required for this.
A strong link along the corridor into Babergh district is vital - the river corridor as a route for people and a vital part of the wildlife network, doesn't stop at the Borough boundary. Closely linked policies in the neighbouring Local Plans would ensure sensible continuity of purpose.