Chapter 1 - Introduction
Support
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Representation ID: 25554
Received: 11/02/2019
Respondent: Wood
We have reviewed the above Ipswich Local Plan Review Preferred Options documents and can confirm that National Grid has no comments to make in response to this consultation.
See attached representation document.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Representation ID: 25859
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
SOCS suggest the Final Draft Local Plan fails the tests of soundness as it is not positively prepared, not justified, not effective and not consistent with national policy.
The Climate Change agenda (NPPF10) is insufficiently addressed and proposals are contrary to this.
The HRA and SA have inadequately and inaccurately assessed the effects of the plan.
Serious adverse effects, as required under NPPF 6 - 17, have not been properly identified.
NPPF-11 has not been adequately taken into account.
See Scanned Representation.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Representation ID: 26005
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Diagram 1 refers to the Drainage and Flood Defence Policy. This has been superseded by the Suffolk Flood Risk Management Strategy which has been endorsed by the Ipswich Borough Council Executive.
See Scanned Representation.
Object
Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review
Representation ID: 26140
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Stepping Stones Biodiversity Charity
Suggest the Final Draft Local Plan fails the tests of soundness as it is not positively prepared, not justified, not effective and not consistent with national policy.
The Climate Change agenda (NPPF10) is insufficiently addressed and proposals are contrary to this.
The HRA and SA have inadequately and inaccurately assessed the effects of the plan.
Serious adverse effects, as required under NPPF 6 - 17, have not been properly identified.
NPPF-11 has not been adequately taken into account.
See scanned representation.