ipswich.gov.uk

CS3

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Representation ID: 25705

Received: 04/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk Chamber of Commerce

Representation Summary:

We welcome the improvements to the IP1 area including more trees and planted areas, however, we must stress the importance of continuing to improve the area around Ipswich Train Station as to ensure a welcoming area to the town for visitors and workers prior to entering IP1.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Representation ID: 25879

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Associated British Ports

Representation Summary:

ABP wish to ensure that the Port's 'significant (economic) role' and ability to expand further and assist in driving growth in the region is protected.
ABP requests that recognition is made in CS3 and its accompanying text to the Port and to other important existing employment and other activities within and adjoining the IP-One area. New development should be sensitive to these existing uses and avoid potential impacts which may prejudice the continued operation and, where appropriate, expansion of these uses.

We suggest the addition of a new criterion into any new policy based on Policy CS3 (see full representation).

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Representation ID: 26047

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Clarity needed within this policy, the Core Strategy and the IP-One section of the Site Allocations Plan of what is the status of the opportunity areas. Paragraph 6.1 of the Site Allocation document sets out - the Opportunity Areas set out development principles for that specific area, which is positive. However, these are not set out in policies, although some areas do have policies within the IP-One section of the document and, again, individual allocation policies take precedence. This doesn't give a consistent vision with clarity for a developer or the ability for the Council to help meet aspirations.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document (DPD) Review

Representation ID: 26055

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: On behalf of Telereal Trillium Ltd

Representation Summary:

Supportive of this policy and encourages IBC through its development of the IP-One Area Action Plan to increase the density at the Site to reflect its deliverability and its contribution towards IBC meeting its housing requirements, including accommodating the additional 20% buffer.

A specific allocation for site IP279 should be made as part of the IP-One Area Action Plan.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.