Support

Representation ID: 25612

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Westerfield Parish Council

Agent: Westerfield Parish Council

Policy DM20
Westerfield Parish Council strongly support the policy DM20 and in particular paragraph 9.20.1 where the Council is clearly committed to ensure that existing transport infrastructure is not adversely affected while determining planning applications.

Object

Representation ID: 25683

Received: 11/03/2019

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

It remains unclear how 'severe' and 'significant' adverse impacts are defined. These need to be clearly defined in the CS. In the case of air quality, there are maximum legal limits for particulates and nitrous oxides, and it would be appropriate for 'significant' to be defined as the legal limit.

Object

Representation ID: 26000

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

County recommend re-draft of policy to include:

- Requirement for maximisation of sustainable transport and safe access;
- Indicative thresholds for documents in line with County guidance;
- Need for assessments to include cumulative impacts;
- Requirement to protect, enhance and connect to rights of way.
- Consideration of school safety and routes;
- Encourage car club facilities;
- Clear framework requiring significant impacts to be limited and refused in certain circumstances.

Additional supporting text explaining travel plan justification.

Paragraph 9.21.8 could be split in two. See suggested wording.

Object

Representation ID: 26113

Received: 01/04/2019

Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary

The word permeability should be removed from `d' in order to promote security and the following addition made; d. promote pedestrian and cycle accessibility to and within the site, ensuring that any new routes are coherent, clearly segregated for pedestrians and cyclists, overlooked and in accordance with the design principles of policy DM12.