ipswich.gov.uk

Policy SP16 - Transport proposals in IP-One

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Preferred Options Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review

Representation ID: 25892

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Associated British Ports

Representation Summary:

ABP supports Policy SP16 and notes the comments at para 5.47 in respect of IBC's continuing aspirations for a Wet Dock Crossing (see comments on CS&PDPD Policy CS20). For the reasons given above, we request the removal from para 5.47 of the reference to "which as a minimum will require a road bridge from the west bank to the Island Site..".

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.

Object

Preferred Options Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review

Representation ID: 26024

Received: 13/03/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Representation Summary:

Following the recent announcement on TUOC, the County continues to support provision of increased east-west capacity. However, the measures set out in this policy (and as shown on the policies map) are not necessarily the same proposals as set out in SP9 and relate to untested routes which may not be deliverable. We would be pleased to discuss this further.

Full text:

See Scanned Representation.