Policy SP16 - Transport proposals in IP-One
Object
Preferred Options Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review
Representation ID: 25892
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Associated British Ports
ABP supports Policy SP16 and notes the comments at para 5.47 in respect of IBC's continuing aspirations for a Wet Dock Crossing (see comments on CS&PDPD Policy CS20). For the reasons given above, we request the removal from para 5.47 of the reference to "which as a minimum will require a road bridge from the west bank to the Island Site..".
See Scanned Representation.
Object
Preferred Options Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review
Representation ID: 26024
Received: 13/03/2019
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Following the recent announcement on TUOC, the County continues to support provision of increased east-west capacity. However, the measures set out in this policy (and as shown on the policies map) are not necessarily the same proposals as set out in SP9 and relate to untested routes which may not be deliverable. We would be pleased to discuss this further.
See Scanned Representation.