ipswich.gov.uk

Ipswich Local Plan Policies Map Final Draft

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Local Plan Policies Maps Final Draft

Representation ID: 26243

Received: 08/02/2020

Respondent: GeoSuffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The key is out of date. County Geological Sites and Regionally Important Geological Sites are all called "County Geological Sites" now. The five locations of the sites are correct, only the key is wrong.

Change suggested by respondent:

Change the key description to "County Geological Sites".

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan Policies Maps Final Draft

Representation ID: 26305

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Mersea Homes Limited

Agent: Mersea Homes Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

With regard to land use designations within the IGS, there is a lack of clarity/consistency to terminology, and in any event there is no need for specific land use allocations within the overall IGS, or justification for the specific areas shown.

Change suggested by respondent:

Removal of land use allocations within the overall IGS allocation, or at least adjustment to the key/text to make clear that all are indicative.

Object

Local Plan Policies Maps Final Draft

Representation ID: 26638

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Ipswich School

Agent: Mr Matt Clarke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to identification of land west of Tuddenham Road, north of Ipswich Millennium Cemetery as “Land Allocated for Sport Use” as it is not required for this purpose.
The release of the Ipswich School land at Notcutts Field, as part of the allocated Ipswich Garden Suburb is not currently considered viable. The school owns other land that would provide suitable land for replacement playing fields within the vicinity and has invested significantly in new and improved facilities at Rushmere St Andrew Sports Centre. It is proposed the site is allocated for 500 dwellings. See accompanying letter for details.

Change suggested by respondent:

Allocate the site for 500 dwellings and not sports use.

Attachments: