Site Ref: IP150e (Policy SP2) Land south of Ravenswood
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26171
Received: 04/02/2020
Respondent: Ravenswood Residents Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
IP150a, IP150d and IP150e equate to 254 houses. Should fully reflect 65.8% private housing and 34.2% social housing mix. Recommend additional new access to Ravenswood to cope with anticipated surge in traffic volumes. Already heavy congestion at access point during; morning/ evening peaks, school drop-off/ pick-up, and, lunch times, which prevents emergency vehicles access. Does "Highway Network" just refer to the Nacton Road/ Thrasher Roundabout or ALL local roads? Second access road should relieve pressure for whole of Ravenswood, not just new sites. Upgrading private road to south of Ravenswood needed as second access. Has additional pupil demand been considered?
A new second access road should be included and should serve the whole of Ravenswood, not just any new sites. Consider pupil demand.
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26179
Received: 28/01/2020
Respondent: Ms Sally Wainman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Concerned about the change to the Local Plan in Ravenswood off Alnesbourne Crescent. New residents will put pressure on the sources of the local GP surgery.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26182
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Hilary Scott
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There is already insufficient car parking as people park illegally throughout Ravenswood. Traffic congestion in Ravenswood is a nightmare. The addition of 126 homes will only worsen this. More homes should be built in central Ipswich rather than on the green land in the outskirts which is bad for wildlife, climate change and traffic pollution/ congestion. A park or a lake should be pursued instead to enhance the area and encourage more wildlife. We need more green spaces, trees and areas of natural beauty no more homes in already overpopulated developments.
It should be used as green space with a park or lake instead.
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26183
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Mrs Helen Abbott
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There would be a significant detrimental impact to the local transport network which is already an issue on the estate. With only one entrance/exit there are already problems with access, particularly during the morning and evening rush hour which is not helped by the passing traffic blocking the main roundabout on Nacton Road, and also the additional traffic at McDonald’s on the Ravenswood roundabout. Adding additional housing to this already hugely congested area and potentially upwards of 250 extra vehicles (realistically this would be more!) is irresponsible without a major revision to the access points provided onto/off of the estate.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26184
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Mrs Jacky Robson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Main concern is that this, in conjunction with the proposal to build houses next to the primary school in Downham Boulevard, will put intolerable pressure on the vehicular access in and out of Ravenswood. This is aggravated by the amount of queuing traffic generated by Macdonalds restaurant, situated near the only entrance/exit. Apart from the traffic problems, Ravenswood seems to have been well-designed with good cycle paths, bus routes etc. I do hope that you will re-consider this decision, and look carefully at the idea of incorporating another entrance/exit to Ravenswood.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26185
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Hallowtree Scout Activity Centre
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This area of land borders an AONB which would be negatively affected by additional vehicular traffic in the area. The existing access track to Bridge Wood/Orwell Meadows/Hallowtree Campsite is already in disrepair. Additional traffic in the area would be at the detriment to the properties in the Alnesbourn Priory site. It is a short-sighted effort by the council to boost housing in an area which is unequipped to handle the additional capacity. No work should be allowed to take place. The land must be kept undisturbed which will allow the flora and fauna to develop.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26187
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Dr Bashar Shatta
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Strongly object. Access is a major problem for all Ravenswood residents as well as parking.New roads in and out of Ravenswood are needed and more parking spaces should be provided before any other houses are built.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26192
Received: 11/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Jonathan N/A
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Generally supportive of a mixed tenure development on this site in line with recent SOS verdict. However, cannot support development until IBC takes significant measures to improve the flow of traffic in the area. The roundabouts at the entrance to Ravenswood are a significant bottle neck, causing dangerous congestion due to illegal manoeuvres. Traffic is regularly problematic at rush hour, but also at other hours due to the popularity of McDonald’s. Solutions might include additional entrances to the residential areas (with measures to prevent use as a cut through), additional entrances to Ravenswood retail park, additional lanes between roundabouts.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26197
Received: 14/02/2020
Respondent: Cindy Lawes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object. A suburb this size should not have only one entrance and exit. The additional 126 houses will bring additional vehicles into the suburb, and this will exacerbate problems. We have to manage through the Henning Road roundabout, which is frequently blocked by people trying to get into the MacDonalds and then out the suburb onto a major roundabout. The Orwell Bridge closures worsen this. Another access road off the A1189 will not alleviate any of the problems. The doctor’s practice is already stretched and this was worsened by the closure of Landseer Surgery. Inadequate health facilities for new residents.
Not specified
Object
Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft
Representation ID: 26614
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Ipswich School
Agent: Mr Matt Clarke
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site IP150e: Allocated in 1997 Local Plan, as part of site ref 6.1. Remainder of Ravenswood community has been built out but several parcels remain undeveloped. It is suggested that a more cautious approach is taken to the likelihood of delivery being achieved within the Plan Period.
Not specified