ipswich.gov.uk

Site Ref: IP152 (Policy SP5 & SP9) Airport Farm Kennels, north of the A14

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26175

Received: 04/02/2020

Respondent: Ravenswood Residents Association

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This development currently poses access constraints which would also need to be master planned comprehensively with the aforementioned IP150e and IP150c sites. Recommend additional new access to Ravenswood to cope with anticipated surge in traffic volumes. Already heavy congestion at access point during; morning/ evening peaks, school drop-off/ pick-up, and, lunch times, which prevents emergency vehicles access.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26190

Received: 11/02/2020

Respondent: JPL Properties LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Owner of Airport Farm Kennels since 1999. While positive to see our land included in the latest Local Plan, we formally object to our land being considered for Park and Ride allocation.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove park and ride from allocation.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26632

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Ravenswood Environmental Group

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan is proposes site IP152 and site IP150c for a total of 30,000 sqm of business and industry and sui generis uses. There is absolutely no justification for this significant development and no explanation of how it will relate to site IP150b and IP150e when traffic, air quality, noise, heritage and ecological constraints must be resolved comprehensively. The plan does nothing to justify or mitigate its impacts and does not insist upon a new major access to this development area. It merely implies that impacts need to be looked at. Masterplanning and EIA must be insisted upon

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified