Object

Representation ID: 26170

Received: 10/02/2020

Respondent: Mr Jamie Churchyard

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object for the following reasons; This is in an area at high risk of flooding; Sewage capacity is already overloaded. The loss of the grassed area would exacerbate this; Goldcrest Newts are present in my garden and so are likely to be present on the site; Would worsen parking; Asbestos/ health risks from demolition; Damage to our property from piling/ heavy machinery. Who would be responsible?; Loss of light/ overshadowing; Damage our environment and risk our property to flooding.

Object

Representation ID: 26199

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Christopher and Carole Williamson

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic concerns. Existing parking pressures and access concerns on Cullingham Road due to lack of existing off road parking, new housing would add additional parking problems as new residents likely to have two vehicles. Highways safety concerns. Namely issues exiting onto Hanford Road, due to loss of road markings, construction traffic access concerns due to narrow entrance. Traffic pollution problems from construction vehicles. Wildlife disruption. Concern over loss of wildlife habitat, need to be encouraging wildlife. Health and well-being concerns. The change of use would cause noise and disruption at evenings and weekends in a quiet location.

Object

Representation ID: 26234

Received: 23/02/2020

Respondent: Mr Stephen Morgan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object strongly to the development of this land for housing. This would have an impact on an already busy road as well as having a detrimental effect on the wildlife around the river bank. Our property would also be overlooked by the development resulting in a loss of privacy. Noise pollution from the said development would also have an impact. Cullingham Road already has issues with parking and this development would make this situation even worse. Access to the site for heavy machinery would be impossible as the road is not wide enough.

Object

Representation ID: 26258

Received: 26/02/2020

Respondent: Mr Tim Leggett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Cullingham Road is a quiet, friendly cul-de-sac which may be diluted with bigger population. Area flooded badly in 1953 and there is increased risk of flooding. Is this the best place for new housing? Concerns about piling and damage compensation. Great crested newts on-site, protected by European Law. Road is poorly maintained by Councils, sewer pipes are insufficient and a "please keep clear" sign needed on Handford Road. Concern about increase in traffic and large vehicles during construction. Insufficient parking. Need a play area and large gardens. Will this be a housing association? If so contrary to owner occupation presence.

Object

Representation ID: 26273

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Margaret Pearson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object strongly to the allocation. Would have an impact on the already busy road as well as having detrimental effect on the wildlife around the river bank. (Crested Newts). Overlooking by the development resulting in loss of privacy. Noise pollution from the said development would also have an impact. Cullingham Road has already issues with parking and this development would make this situation even worse. Access to the site for heavy machinery would be impossible as the road is not wide enough. Also the drainage and sewage from this new site will have significant overload on the already overcrowded road.

Object

Representation ID: 26612

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

IP354, the following information could be added:
'The site lies in the vicinity of Roman remains, likely on reclaimed land. The site lies across Archaeological Character Zones 1d and 2a as set out in the Archaeology and Development SPD. It is likely that archaeological considerations could be managed through conditions on consent, although early consultation with Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service is advised.'