ipswich.gov.uk

Policy CS4 Protecting our Assets

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Support

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26252

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: AONB

Representation Summary:

The AONB team welcomes the amendment to bullet point (h) Policy CS4 which will help ensure that the purposes for designation of the Suffolk Coast & Heaths is recognised and that the Natural Beauty & Special Qualities of the nationally designated landscape is considered as part of decision making.

Change suggested by respondent:

N/A

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26399

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Existing green rim is an asset and should be protected by adding it to CS4, especially as IBC have previously massively reduced its size and are now attempting to reclassify it and destroy it. Not clear what RAMS S106 payments agreed with CBRE and Crest sites as S106 are not publicly available. If no RAMS tariffs included in the S106 agreements this could be in breach of this SPD and policies CS4, CS17 and Policy DM31 of the adopted CS. New CS would be unsound in relation to CS4 CS17 and DM 8 as no means of funding the required.

Change suggested by respondent:

Add the Green Rim as an asset to Policy CS4.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26518

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Existing green rim is an asset and should be protected by adding it to CS4, especially as IBC have previously massively reduced its size and are now attempting to reclassify it and destroy it. Not clear what RAMS S106 payments agreed with CBRE and Crest sites as S106 are not publicly available. If no RAMS tariffs included in the S106 agreements this could be in breach of this SPD and policies CS4, CS17 and Policy DM31 of the adopted CS. New CS would be unsound in relation to CS4 CS17 and DM 8 as no means of funding the required.

Change suggested by respondent:

Add the Green Rim as an asset to Policy CS4.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26548

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Marine Management Organisation

Agent: Marine Management Organisation

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Section 8.78 refers to the South East Inshore Marine Plan. This is currently out for consultation and as such is now a document for material consideration. Recommend the draft South East Marine Plan mentioned here. Previous engagement periods were not formal consultation. Only one plan for the South East area, not an inshore and offshore plan as there is for other areas. The East Inshore and East Offshore Marine Plans were adopted in 2014, which covers the adjacent areas, and the north bank of the Orwell. Ensure correct reference to the South East and East marine plan areas where included.

Change suggested by respondent:

Ensure correct terminology with reference to the draft South East Marine Plan and The East Inshore and East Offshore Marine Plans.

Attachments:

Support

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26666

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We welcome the changes to criterion 3 regarding the Council’s commitment to a local list in policy.

Change suggested by respondent:

N/A

Attachments: