ipswich.gov.uk

Policy DM7 Provision of Private Outdoor Amenity Space and New and Existing Developments

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26299

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd (HBF)

Agent: Home Builders Federation Ltd (HBF)

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

DM7 is unsound as it not consistent with national policy or justified. This policy is too prescriptive as to the levels of open space required for homes within Ipswich. Housebuilders understand the market and the amount of open space that people expect and as such this policy needs to provide a greater flexibility. Ipswich is highly constrained and if the Council is seeking to set standards for open space within developments and meet its housing requirements it will need to offer flexibility.

Change suggested by respondent:

We would suggest the following wording: “To ensure that new residential developments deliver a high quality and environmentally sustainable living environment, developments for houses and ground floor maisonettes will be required to incorporate well-designed and located private outdoor amenity space of an appropriate type and amount. When considering the provision of outdoor amenity space applicants should have regard to the need to meet other density and urban design requirements of the plan.

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26428

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Agent: Persimmon Homes

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Policy DM7 proposes minimum standard areas for private outdoor amenity space, but no evidence could be found that supports the figures detailed, including within local design guides. In addition the application of such standards varies between neighbouring authorities, which would reasonably call into question whether this policy has been adequately justified and is consistent with National Policy, whilst also being effective over the plan period. Where the policy details that lower figures may be acceptable where there is unavoidable conflict with the need to meet density requirements, additional flaws in its effectiveness arise due the questionability of how site densities are calculated given the current limited weight given to market forces and demands for different types of dwellings. Persimmon also endorse the statements made by the HBF.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26561

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Cardinal Lofts (Mill) Ltd

Agent: Cardinal Lofts (Mill) Ltd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

There should be explicit recognition that, in respect of high density, previously developed sites, it may not always be possible to make full provision for private amenity space to accord with the Council’s standards. Summary: Object for the reasons set out above.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments: