ipswich.gov.uk

Policy DM8 The Natural Environment

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26254

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: AONB

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The AONB team support the objectives of this policy. European protected sites are now called Habitats Sites and the policy should be amended to reflect this for accuracy- see below

Change suggested by respondent:

"Sites of International and National Importance
Proposals which would have an adverse impact on Habitats Sites will not be permitted, either alone or in combination with other proposals, unless imperative reasons of overriding public interest exist in accordance with the provisions of the European Habitats Directive."

Support

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26256

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: AONB

Representation Summary:

The title link to policy DM8 under Chapter 9 currently reads The Natural Development. This should be changed to readThe Natural Environment

Change suggested by respondent:

N/A

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26317

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Suffolk Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Conditions a. and c. in relation to SSSI's clearly conflict with Paragraph 175b of the NPPF which only allows for Condition b. (benefits outweighing impacts). This Policy should be updated to reflect this.

Change suggested by respondent:

Delete conditions a and c.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26409

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Existing green rim is an asset and should be protected by adding it to CS4, especially as IBC have previously massively reduced its size and are now attempting to reclassify it and destroy it. Not clear what RAMS S106 payments agreed with CBRE and Crest sites as S106 are not publicly available. If no RAMS tariffs included in the S106 agreements this could be in breach of this SPD and policies CS4, CS17 and Policy DM31 of the adopted CS. New CS would be unsound in relation to CS4 CS17 and DM 8 as no means of funding the required.

Change suggested by respondent:

Add green rim as an asset to CS4.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26422

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: East Suffolk Council

Agent: East Suffolk Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Council is supportive of this policy and the approach it takes. However, the equivalent policy within the Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan (Policy SCLP10.1) refers to the Recreational Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS), and as such provides a development management policy approach to implementing the strategy which has been worked up on a cross-boundary basis. In this respect, to be effective, Policy DM8 could be strengthened through reference to securing contributions to facilitate the implementation of the strategy.

Change suggested by respondent:

Add reference to securing contributions to facilitate the implementation of the RAMS.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26529

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Existing green rim is an asset and should be protected by adding it to CS4, especially as IBC have previously massively reduced its size and are now attempting to reclassify it and destroy it. Not clear what RAMS S106 payments agreed with CBRE and Crest sites as S106 are not publicly available. If no RAMS tariffs included in the S106 agreements this could be in breach of this SPD and policies CS4, CS17 and Policy DM31 of the adopted CS. New CS would be unsound in relation to CS4 CS17 and DM8 as no means of funding the required.

Change suggested by respondent:

Add green rim as an asset to CS4.

Attachments: