Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Search representations

Results for River Action Group search

New search New search

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS5: Improving Accessibility

Representation ID: 5937

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS17: Delivering Infrastructure

Representation ID: 5938

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, it is not known whether the plan will improve matters.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS20: Key Transport Proposals

Representation ID: 5939

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS1: Sustainable Development - Climate Change

Representation ID: 24069

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plans will protect our health and deal with pollution. The plan can achieve sustainable development. It is not known whether the removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats and farmland is acceptable and whether the Country Park will be delivered in a timely manner. It is not known whether the plan will improve matters relating to infrastructure and services drainage, flooding and sewage.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth

Representation ID: 24070

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is not known where the 12,500 jobs will come from or whether the retail and shopping policies are achievable and would make Ipswich a better place.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS4: Protecting our Assets

Representation ID: 24071

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is not known whether the removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats and farmland is acceptable or whether the plan will deliver the Country Park in a timely manner.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS10: Ipswich Garden Suburb

Representation ID: 24072

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is not known whether the removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats and farmland is acceptable and whether the plan will deliver the Country Park in a timely manner.

Full text:

See attached

Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

CS7: The Amount of Housing Required

Representation ID: 24073

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: River Action Group

Representation Summary:

There is a need for 13,500 homes and this number is desirable.

Full text:

See attached

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.