Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Search representations
Results for River Action Group search
New searchObject
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS5: Improving Accessibility
Representation ID: 5937
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS17: Delivering Infrastructure
Representation ID: 5938
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy. Hospitals, schools and access to GPs and social care are currently inadequate, how will they cope with growth? Infrastructure and services drainage, flooding, sewage proposals - there are already problems in this area, it is not known whether the plan will improve matters.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS20: Key Transport Proposals
Representation ID: 5939
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Expect further gridlock and adverse impacts on existing residents and the local economy, which the plan will not remedy.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS1: Sustainable Development - Climate Change
Representation ID: 24069
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The plans will protect our health and deal with pollution. The plan can achieve sustainable development. It is not known whether the removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats and farmland is acceptable and whether the Country Park will be delivered in a timely manner. It is not known whether the plan will improve matters relating to infrastructure and services drainage, flooding and sewage.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth
Representation ID: 24070
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is not known where the 12,500 jobs will come from or whether the retail and shopping policies are achievable and would make Ipswich a better place.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS4: Protecting our Assets
Representation ID: 24071
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is not known whether the removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats and farmland is acceptable or whether the plan will deliver the Country Park in a timely manner.
See attached
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS10: Ipswich Garden Suburb
Representation ID: 24072
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is not known whether the removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats and farmland is acceptable and whether the plan will deliver the Country Park in a timely manner.
See attached
Support
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
CS7: The Amount of Housing Required
Representation ID: 24073
Received: 05/03/2015
Respondent: River Action Group
There is a need for 13,500 homes and this number is desirable.
See attached