Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review

Object

Representation ID: 5169

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The location of the secondary school is erroneous and does not contribute to sustainable travel patterns.

Object

Representation ID: 5170

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The scale of housing indicated in this document is unsustainable without significant new road, cycle and pedestrian infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 5171

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

No new roads other than those actually in the new development are indicated in the SPD.

Object

Representation ID: 5172

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Subsequent traffic modelling by the applicants and by SCC invalidate the previous assumptions upon which the Secretary of State made his previous judgement.

Object

Representation ID: 5173

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The target for social rented housing is so high as to exclude meaningful numbers of other forms of affordable housing, especially shared equity.

Object

Representation ID: 5174

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This affordable housing target bears no relation to the numbers being discussed with developers, nor indeed to statements made by cabinet members at Executive. It is misleading.

Object

Representation ID: 5175

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

See above objections to the increase in size of the central shopping area.

Object

Representation ID: 5176

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This section fails to take account of the report by Frank Field and Naomi Eisenstadt to SCC on the function and location of children's centres.

Object

Representation ID: 5177

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This statement is not complete without recognizing the pressures on existing road infrastructure caused by development at Ravenswood, which is now requiring remedial action by SCC.

Object

Representation ID: 5178

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This document and no other IBC document has any substantive policy for cycle or pedestrian infrastructure. These statements of intent are meaningless without it.