Proposed Submission Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document

Object

Representation ID: 5184

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

A greater proportion of this land should be allocated for housing.

Object

Representation ID: 5185

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The emerging consensus from NALEP, SCC, UCS and the owner of the port is for employment use. IBC has been involved in these discussions.

Object

Representation ID: 5186

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The primary allocation for this site should be residential - especially for sheltered and very sheltered accommodation. This reflects the aspirations for the town centre from Ipswich Central and SCC.

Object

Representation ID: 5188

Received: 04/03/2015

Respondent: Parliament

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This site might be needed as one of the options for a northern route.