Support

Representation ID: 5295

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

It does not appear that any sites are undeliverable for transport reasons when considered individually and if an assumption is made that proper provision is made for sustainable transport measures and highway mitigation. This statement needs to be considered against those made on the Core Strategy and cumulative transport impacts.

Support

Representation ID: 5296

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

It does not appear that any sites are undeliverable for transport reasons when considered individually and if an assumption is made that proper provision is made for sustainable transport measures and highway mitigation. This statement needs to be considered against those made on the Core Strategy and cumulative transport impacts.

Support

Representation ID: 5297

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

It does not appear that any sites are undeliverable for transport reasons when considered individually and if an assumption is made that proper provision is made for sustainable transport measures and highway mitigation. This statement needs to be considered against those made on the Core Strategy and cumulative transport impacts.

Object

Representation ID: 5298

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The County Council is content with policies SP15 and SP16, however the supporting text could be more accurate in respect of the Travel Ipswich programme. Paragraph 5.41 should be amended as follows: 'Due for completion in 2015, it forms part of a wider long term strategy to achieve a 15% switch to more sustainable modes, to enable Ipswich to accommodate planned growth without a corresponding growth in congestion. This will include some further improvements to walking routes from the railway station ...'

Support

Representation ID: 5299

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

This document allocates land at Felixstowe Road/Derby Road (site IP010a) for additional primary school provision. The allocation at IP010a is necessary to enable expansion of the school. The school is already on a small site to meet demand arising from the housing growth planned in the vicinity of the school.

Object

Representation ID: 5300

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This document allocates land at the University (site IP258) for additional primary school provision. Site IP258 is not deliverable for the purposes of Policy CS15 or for mitigating the impact of Town Centre Housing sites. The County Council is considering other options for making suitable primary school provision for demand arising from the Town Centre and intends to have identified another deliverable option by the time of the examination.

Object

Representation ID: 5301

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This document is only deliverable with sufficient infrastructure. Indicative Section 106 costs (education, libraries, waste) and highway requirements are set out in the full representation.
Early years: larger sites (>200 dwellings) may need to make on site provision.
Primary: in principle, primary school places can be provided (predicated on development funding places, where compliant with the CIL Regulations).
Secondary: the new secondary school planned at Garden Suburb (CS10) will also need to mitigate demand arising from background and housing growth across Ipswich.
Sites should be deliverable with suitable (SFRA) flood risk measures. Archaeology does not prevent sites being allocated.

Object

Representation ID: 5302

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Allocation IP004 is in close proximity to permitted mineral and waste uses, which represent a constraint on the development of this site. In line with policies in the Minerals and Waste Plans and DM26 of the Ipswich Local Plan are likely to apply to ensure that the new development is compatible with that which is already permitted. If the design of new development at IP004 recognises these constraints, the allocation should prove deliverable.

Object

Representation ID: 5303

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Site IP080 needs to recognise the mineral handling facilities at the Port, which are protected through the Minerals Plan and DM26 and are part of the delivery of a wider marine plan

Object

Representation ID: 5304

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: New Anglia LEP for Norfolk and Suffolk

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Allocation IP037 needs to recognise the mineral handling facilities at the Port, which are protected through the Minerals Plan and DM26 and are part of the delivery of a wider marine plan.