Object

Representation ID: 24302

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Paragraph 3.4 of the Statement of Consultation does not accurately capture the issues raised, including the lack of effective policies and outcomes from the Duty to Co-operate. Concerned that the genuine concerns and issues raised by the public have been disregarded.

Object

Representation ID: 24303

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Paragraph 3.4 of the Statement of Consultation does not accurately capture all of the issues raised. This includes issues raised in relation to the assessment of housing not being updated to reflect the most recent information available including the DCLG Household Projections 27th February 2015 and the ONS migration data. Concerned that the genuine concerns and issues raised by the public have been disregarded.

Object

Representation ID: 24304

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Paragraph 3.4 of the Statement of Consultation doesn't accurately capture all issues raised. Concerned genuine concerns and issues raised were disregarded. This includes issues raised in relation to the allocation of the entire Northern Fringe which may not be deliverable due to severe traffic congestion, negative impact on air quality and lack of sewage infrastructure. Failure to address cumulative needs for key strategic infrastructure within the Borough including roads and sewage infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 24305

Received: 22/11/2015

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Paragraph 3.4 of the Statement of Consultation does not accurately capture all issues raised, including in relation to addressing severe obstacles to growth identified by the viability report and the employment space requirements identified by the EEFM 2015. There has also been failure to consider how the acquisition of the sugar beet site will impact on jobs and homes growth strategies in the Borough. Concerned that the genuine concerns and issues raised by the public have been disregarded.